MooPig's Fact-Checker Department :: "For the publication of No Easy Day"

Retrieved by Pat Darnell  |  Oct 21, 2012  |  Bryan TX

[Picture LINK]

Navy SEAL Author Rejects the Pentagon's Legal Threat - Politics - The Atlantic Wire:

EXCERPT  |   ""Mr. Owen sought legal advice about his responsibilities before agreeing to publish his book and scrupulously reviewed the work to ensure that it did not disclose any material that would breach his agreements or put his former comrades at risk," wrote Robert D. Luskin, an attorney at D.C. lobbying behemoth Patton Boggs. "Mr. Owen is proud of his service and respectful of his obligations. But he has earned the right to tell his story."" (JOHN HUDSON. AUG 31, 2012. HERE)

'via Blog this'

In a printing shop is the Bindery Department. The pages have been typeset, stripped to film, and plated in the Plate Room. The Press Room prints the pages on large paper. In the Bindery the pages are cut to size and collated into lifts. The lifts of pages then go through several steps of gluing, sewing, and binding. Then the cover is pressed on the "book," in the Bindery.

The point is that during any of these stages the book can be read. Especially from the very start when it is typeset and put on film, can it be read several times by the laymen workers, journeymen, and print bosses, even the janitor reads it.

It mystifies MooPig when it reads a story that implies lawyers issuing a cease or desist publishing a book to anyone ... what exactly is the point? The deed is already done, it's ancient history, it's moot, you jackals.

EXCERPT from the Article | " ...According to the letter, the nondisclosure agreement signed by Bissonnette when he was a SEAL only applied to "specially identified Special Access Programs" and not missions such as the May 1, 2011 raid.

That's an argument that may come as a surprise to some legal experts, who considered the Pentagon's case against Bissonnette a "slam dunk" given his failure to submit his book for pre-publication review. ... "

Pre-publication review -- are they daft? Most authors today are self-published. One can easily write a 365 page book on the Internet, and upload it all over the world. What in God's green earth is a pre-publication review?

It is an HONOR system ... but all persons define HONOR differently, and that is why this sucks.

EXCERPT | " ...Last night, [Aug 28, 2012] the public got its first taste of the book's contents as the Associated Press and The Huffington Post obtained pre-release copies of it. (JOHN HUDSON. AUG 29, 2012. HERE)... "

When a buck is to be made, well, it seems that brings out the money grubbers. And the more they try to BAN this book by Bissonette, the greater it will profit the author out here in the markets. Yes, negative press is just as good, if not better than, approved press releases. The story is as old as the Torah.

I can just see Carl Marx submitting his little book for a pre-publication review.

But MooPig Fact-Checker Department holds this conjecture as the real reason the administration would try to hide this book from the public:

EXCERPT | " ...Bissonnette [aka Mark Owen] is also critical of President Obama in his story, saying that no one on the team was a fan of the president and that they believed he and other leaders would inflate their own roles in the story. Even before the raid began, the SEALs joked about how they would help Obama get re-elected and also speculated about who would play them in the Hollywood movie. Despite their personal feelings about Obama, however, the SEALs did agree that he made the right call, saying "Although we applauded the decision-making in this case, there was no doubt in anybody’s mind that he would take all the political credit for this too.”(DASHIELL BENNETT. AUG 29, 2012. HERE)... "

NEXT WEEK  ::  What is Bootlegging...?

______________________Reference
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/08/navy-seal-author-rejects-pentagons-legal-threat/56433/
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/08/lawyers-former-seal-author-almost-certainly-facing-legal-trouble/56349/
Origin:  1625–35, Americanism ; boot + leg; secondary senses arose from practice of hiding a liquor bottle in the leg of one's boot
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/28/no-easy-day-bin-laden-raid-book_n_1837947.html
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/08/seal-book-says-bin-laden-was-unarmed-killed-outside-his-bedroom/56311/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/23/author-bin-laden-raid-insider-account-idd-could-face-legal-trouble/
http://www.heavy.com/news/2012/08/no-easy-day-shocking-details-top-10-facts-you-need-to-know/

MooPig Cyber Security :: "No -- it can't be -- it's a Rockefeller"

[FEDERAL JACK LOGO LINK]

The End of our Game is Near, Again
by Pat Darnell  |  May 22, 2011  |  Bryan TX

" ... If the U.S. Government has attempted to control and censor the Internet before it will most likely happen again. The establishments agenda is on the wall that they want to either control the Internet to be more like cable TV or have it shut down. The one that told that agenda is non other then Jay Rockefeller. ... "

[LINK]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1394820
United States
5/22/2011 5:52 AM
Re: BREAKING & URGENT---So long GLP---Obama has had enough --- S.968 bill that will eliminate free information on the Internet Quote [+] #
Anon. Cow. Comment:
this should be pinned

when did civil law become criminal law?

copyright infringement is NOT the jurisdiction of the Attorney General of the United States!

when was the last time you heard of the AJ's office going after someone over a book copyright or movie rights?

i am sickened by this.

this is just attempt to chill free speech.

someone steals your material then sue

using some quotes is acceptable literary practice
the arts, journalism, and the industry should set the standards not a law enforcement division

if people could not quote, there would be no non-fiction books

Justice Department is NUTS

LEAHY IS NUTS

" ... Both law enforcement and rights holders are currently limited in the remedies available to combat websites dedicated to offering infringing content and products,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), the bill’s main sponsor. The proposal is an offshoot to the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act introduced last year. It was scrapped by its authors in exchange for the Protect IP Act in a bid to win Senate passage.” ...[LINK]"

well, then everybody should sue CNN cause they pull stuff off the net all the time to show it and discuss it on their t.v. show (i won't call it journalism)

and google is totally composed of other people's stuff

so google should be shut down

Feds will just have to be legally forced to uphold the Fair Use Act.

http://youtu.be/Ct9xzXUQLuY

" ... This bill is yet another bill that will further give the U.S. Government even more power to shut down any website which criticizes the Establishment or any mega fascist Corporation all under the guise of further protecting copyright. ..."

What's the ISSUE? [U.S.W.G.O. LINK]
 "... A new bill [S.968] ... being supported by the Obama Administration and being sponsored by at least 11 senators of all stripes is being introduced that will threaten news aggregation, truth blogs, documentary filmmakers, political websites, and any website that uses portions or snippets from mainstream media websites or any portion of any copyrighted content."

MooPig Reserves the Right to "Make-it-up" as We Go ... even if it means our Demise. [Ed. 22May2011]

*

*

*

What, me Worry?

MooPig State of the Union Address Review :: "SPUTNIK Moment, HUNH?"

Sputnik was the 184-pound satellite that the Soviet Union launched into outer space on Oct. 4, 1957
by Pat Darnell

Here I am pondering my ballooning midriff, my unsolicited belly fat bubble weighing in at about 185 pounds, and there goes that upstart crow, Barry Obama, saying, "... "This is our generation's Sputnik moment," Obama also said." ... As a result, we need to fund ... a level of research and development we haven't seen since the height of the space race," ... "

"It's hard to see how he or the Congress can resolve this contradiction—Kennedy-esque vigor and investment on the one hand, Ike-like torpor and penny-pinching on the other. He said much of this extra money could be freed up by eliminating subsidies for the oil companies. First, good luck on that. And second, that alone won't free up enough. (Kaplan, Fred. Jan 25, 2011. HERE)"

Raw is better than boring, so this launch set the pace for the USA space program up to today. The USSR, Soviets, had launched a ball the size of a heavy weight boxer into outer space and " ... "It really doesn't matter whether the satellite has any military value. The important thing is that the Russians have left the earth and the race for control of the universe has started." (Reedy, George. circa 1960's. His emphasis.)

" ... John Kennedy ran for president in 1960, promising a "new frontier" founded on "vigor." Early in his term, he directly responded to Sputnik in two ways: He poured money into the Minuteman ICBM program (both before and after he realized that the missile gap was a myth). And he pledged to land an American on the moon by the end of the decade. (Kaplan, Fred. ibid.) ... "

*

*

*

MooPig Site Review :: "That Nagging Little unresolved Question ..."

Has SATAN really entered the Body of the Person Known as ...?
Site Review by Pat Darnell

LINK -- http://serveajudge.org/public/

 ...Barack Obama, aka: Barack Obama, Jr., aka: Barack Hussein Obama, aka: Barry Soetoro; aka: Barry Obama; aka: Barack Obama, presumed President of the United States; ...???


The Grand Jury Presentments presented herein have been handed down by virtue of the rights vested under Amendment 1 and 5:




Amendment I of the United States Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment V of the United States Constitution

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictmentof a Grand Jury..

Constitutional “standing” regarding these presentments is therefore vested with the People.

Such standing by the People shall then require that the Judicial Court determine if the criminal activity being charged in said Presentments are indeed in violation of Constitutional law and if so, the Court must act to prosecute such charges. 


Each Jury member was eligible as follows:

1) A citizen of the United States;
2) A citizen of eighteen (18) years or older;
3) A resident of a State chartered within the United States of America;
4) Was in possession of his/her natural faculties, of ordinary intelligence, of sound judgment and of fair character;
5) Possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language;
6) Were not serving as a trial juror in any court;
7) Had not been convicted of a malfeasance in office, a felony, or other high crime;
8) Were not serving as an elected public officer.

Each Jury member did SWEAR or AFFIRM as follows:

“That I (jury member) shall diligently inquire, and true presentment make, of all such matters as may be given me before the jury, or shall come to my knowledge, touching such service. I shall present no person through prejudice or ill will, nor leave any un-presented through fear or favor, but in all my presentments shall endeavor to present the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth (affirmed) or so help me God (sworn).”

That Obama is NOT eligible under the laws of the Constitution of the United States as provided for in Article II, Section 1.

Said Article II, Section 1 states:

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Wherefore, Obama is not a “natural born” Citizen for the following reasons:

1) Obama was NOT born of mother and father who were BOTH US Citizens.

2) Obama was a British Citizen “at birth.”

3) Obama was born in Kenya.

4) Obama's mother did not meet US Immigration laws necessary to pass US Citizenship to Obama.

See Count One “EVIDENCE” Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 attached hereto and made a part hereof.

...

READ the rest of Article HERE

*

*

*

faceBook US Grand Jury