MooPig Report from the Middle :: "A Million LIKES equals one New Puppy"

[Picture LINK] Trolling for more "pageviews?"

We Didn't Think :: It was Possible
Mixed Mashed Articles by Pat Darnell  |  Nov 1, 2014  |  Bryan TX

"We didn't think" is the first half of this comparison, while "It was possible" is the other half of our output. In summary, MooPig Wisdom is a compendium with 3290 self-published articles since 2006. Most articles spin stories already breaching people's minds by mish-mashing published articles from many secondary sources. Journalism has been put on notice, so to speak.

"We didn't think" our musings would interest anyone in the short term, nor in the long term. We did it to write about interesting developments that might inspire our six children. But they read maybe one tenth of one percent of the posts. So we failed to reach our children. However "it was possible" to attract over a million outside readers in eight years.

How do we know that? With Google's help we charted 1,155,609 pageviews over that period of time. That excludes our own viewing of the pages, and we know we have only single digit numbers of followers. We are just one out of thousands of blogs, if you can call us that, that uses content from other sources. We exist to re-direct while making some foolhardy conclusions from "what we have read." Eh?

Three things help in attracting pageviews, or LIKE's: 1-we don't advertise anything thus our page loads fast, 2-we lay claim to high ideals in our posts, 3-pirated pictures of women's bosoms attracts the most pageviews per article no matter what the content is in those posts. [Note: our number four largest attraction of pageviews is this one.. showing Erika Eleniak's ample bosom.]

Other blogs can produce 20,000 pageviews per day ... one of our favorite is Pribek. So their totals are several millions for an eight year existence. Pribek focuses on music in his blog, and specifically on electric guitar music performances, business, and related anecdotes.

So, you see, dear reader, the numbers are quantifiable, and pertain to content. Content will bring you out of your anonymity to a greater place -- one million pageviews! MooPig Wisdom will always "try" to stick to its goal of promoting "Voice, Content, and Style" in all its industry.

How to get those million views in the shortest amount of time? Here is an article that puts that figure to test:

The following article asks: "...Where’s the authenticity? Or, putting it another way, where are the corporate equivalents of a puppy post?"

How long does it take to get one million likes on Facebook? My guess is 8 hours. - Anthill Online:

'via Blog this'

"...What can we learn from this? That heartfelt, ‘grass-roots’ content wins. This is a natural, emotive and real piece of content.

"...Social Object Theory, in relation to social media, means that there must be something to have a conversation about. Simply creating a brand page on Facebook and filling it with inane or pithy content, is not a social media strategy..."

CONCLUSION
It might interest you that in Google Chrome you can go to New Incognito Window to surf the net. It is in the settings on your menu bar that you use to customize and control Google Chrome.

______________________Reference
http://anthillonline.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-get-one-million-likes-on-facebook-my-guess-is-8-hours/
http://pribek.net/
http://rap.genius.com/Rakim-flow-forever-lyrics#note-1533651
http://alfalfalfa.com/archives/6755318.html
http://moopigwisdom.blogspot.com/2010/06/best-poop-blog-post-of-2010-nominations.html

MooPig Tech Coroner :: "Licensing Content Makers"

The Free Run is Over; too much Freedom?
Mashed articles by Pat Darnell  |  Feb 11, 2014  |  Bryan TX

[Picture LINK] Google Tips Boynton Beach Police To 2 Child Porn Images Attached To Draft Email | Story by Scott T. Smith

Is this claim by PC Magazine true? " ... And let's face it, right now the whole Internet scene is a mess. How could regulation be bad (JOHN C. DVORAK. JANUARY 29, 2014. LINK) ...?"

We at MooPig Think Tank disagree; we like the chaos of the Internet.  FCC wants to be a player, and protect its radio and TV turfs. We think that is what they do best, but licencing Internet Content? C'mon! Really? All of it?

The Next Phase of the Internet: Licensing Content Makers | John C. Dvorak | PCMag.com: "This moment in time represents a true golden age of the Internet but such ages are always thwarted in one way of another. For close to 10 years I've been saying that at some point in the future, the Wild West of the Internet will be clamped down and you'll need a license to broadcast content over the Internet. I do not see any trend that does not point in this direction. For a perfect example, look at the debate over net neutrality and filtering or throttling streaming content from the likes of Netflix and Amazon over various mechanisms such as your PC or Roku."
'via Blog this'

Here's a licencing nightmare for you:

" ... Google Images is a search service owned by Google and introduced in July 2001, that allows users to search the Web for image content.[1] The keywords for the image search are based on the filename of the image, the link text pointing to the image, and text adjacent to the image. When searching for an image, a thumbnail of each matching image is displayed. When the user clicks on a thumbnail, the image is displayed in a box over the website that it came from. The user can then close the box and browse the website, or view the full-sized image (wiki. LINK)..."

Wiki goes on to describe Google Images: " ...In 2001, 250 million images were indexed. In 2005, this grew to 1 billion. By 2010, the index reached 10 billion images. As of July 2010, the service receives over one billion views a day. Google introduced a sort by subject feature for a visual category scheme overview of a search query in May 2011 (wiki. LINK).... "

Think about it; a billion visits per day on Google Images alone, on 10 billion images with all their content. MooPig knows it gets all its domestic and foreign visitors from Google Images. So if FCC gets its way and licences all the content of the Internet, we will cease to exist. Big boy corp's and hogs will then take over the Internet.

CONCLUSION
" ... Signal/RF interference problem does not exist with the Internet, where millions of blogs, podcasts, and video networks can and do co-exist. Thus, some other rationale will eventually be determined to limit access in the same way access was limited to the real radio pioneers (ibid. DVORAK.) ..."

" ... There is already talk about clamping down on various forms of hate speech online. Who determines what constitutes hate speech?
Under the guise of anti-bullying all sorts of real attacks on free speech are now common. "Think of the children" will become the rallying cry as very smart people manage to lock down the net for once and for all using every trick imaginable.
I personally do not think there is anything we can do about the eventual draconian regulation of the Internet by government authorities. It won't be tomorrow (I hope not anyway), but it is coming. Enjoy what we have while it lasts.
I'll be waiting to fill out some forms. I think I can get a license.(ibid. Dvorak) ..."

_________________Reference
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2430020,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03079TX1K0000585
http://www.cbs12.com/news/top-stories/stories/vid_13123.shtml
^ Zipern, Andrew. "A Quick Way to Search For Images on the Web." New York Times. 12 July 2001. Retrieved 13 September 2009.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/12/technology/news-watch-a-quick-way-to-search-for-images-on-the-web.html

Muse Juice 1995

A Brief History of  Time... Eb and Flo of David and Johnny
by Pat Darnell

Bryan-College Station, TX  |  04.19.2010
In a conference room at St. Agatha’s is Dr. Harbor– a Presbyterian Minister–, David Crosby, and Johnny Lydon. It is the year 1995.

Dr Harbor [Presbyter Minister]: “I have known both of you all your lives; I know your parents and I have performed marriages and funerals for many of your relations.”

[Crosby and Lydon both nod in agreement to what Dr. Harbor is saying.]

Dr Harbor: “You both sang in the choirs from childhood till you left in your late teens, correct?” Both nod yes. “I baptized you, Johnny, in 1968 when you were twelve, and I baptized you David in 1953.”

“Now Johnny I have you both here because it is time you own up to the fact that your music is not as good as David’s. Therefore, I ask you to consider the long term part of your golden years as Johnny Rotten?”

Johnny: “Why is that Dr Harbor? I have a large following! [A bit shocked]”

Dr Harbor: “Let me explain Johnny, David’s songs are about genuine feelings of love for women, for the sea, and for humanity. David never contrives a song as a ‘hit,’ rather he mixes concoctions of heart and beauty …the results are organic, non-formulaic, asymmetric structure, naturally flowing melody wrapped in rich open-tunings from his guitar.”

David: “Hey, I’m a happy guy. When I get an idea I want to pursue it immediately because there is a certain surge of muse juice right at that point [laughter].”

Dr Harbor: “I want you both to know I was there at the birth of Rock ‘n Roll. I know in my heart what spawned it, and I have suffered the up and down roller coasters in my days, of pop culture and its impact on our liturgy. Yes?”

Johnny: [looks very unhappy] “You two are making me feel rotten. I have tried to end Rock ‘n Roll. It’s an old fashion format, idiots performing, and it’s a plague, it’s rotten, it’s a disease.”

Dr. Harbor: “To continue, coming from a non-musical background… I will try instead to compare to decadence:“

Satire is the last flicker of originality in a passing epoch, as it faces the on-road of staleness and boredom. Freshness has gone: bitterness remains. The prolongation of outworn forms of life means a slow decadence in which there is repetition without any fruit in the reaping of value. There may be high survival power. For decadence undisturbed by originality or by external forces is a slow process. But the values of life are slowly ebbing. There remains the show of civilization, without any of its realities. (Whitehead, Alfred N; 1955, Adventures of ideas)

... “Due to numerous present-day responsibilities, even “Muse Juice” is no longer what it once was… fits very well – for instance the intent of artists, musicians and painters alike, to get off the stuff; to get clean of substance abuse. Like these lyrics --

If I could just make it [off] this time, I’d never need to read another highway sign;
Smoking [ditch] weed, drinking rocket fuel… brother tell me where you been? (0:56, Salvation, Pribek)

And David’s lyrics of one of his first songs:
When I finally get myself together
I’m going to get down in that sunny southern weather
And I find a place inside to laugh
Separate the wheat from the chaff
I feel like I owe it to someone (D Crosby, Almost cut my hair)

Decadence is when the parts of the organism [say a flower] no longer support the life of the organism. It is similar in my mind to sour grapes, flower petals after pollination….

“I ask you two my esteemed students… lyricists, com-mentors, tort-mentors and emailers, is this our way of being part of “those who deplore decadence because we are nostalgic for a golden age of social unity, while those who praise decadence elevate the self-aware, seemingly self-determined individual, answerable only to himself/herself?”

“If so, then this is where you, Johnny Rotten, come in… between the advance and decline of art is The Dialectic of Decadence... (Donald Kuspit, 1993 and 2000, the Dialectic of decadence)
By the mid-sixties [a] minimalist faith created a distinct crisis in painting. Painting had corroborated the flat reality that it secretly always had been. With Stella’s flat black paintings, Ryman’s flat white paintings, and Marden’s flat gray paintings, [Rothko's hazes of non-colors,] young artists, at least the ones that acknowledged this history were literally up against the wall, with no place to go.

“And there remain you Johnny Lydon to this day… a minimalist who is on a mission with no place to go.”

“That is why I ‘Dr Harbor in 1995’ ask you Johnny Rotten to donate your liver to David Crosby.”

“Just in case we need a backup liver, we need yours, Johnny.”

"Can't things just turn out like I planned," sighed Dr Harbor ...

If Dr Harbor is the authority that both musicians most trust then State-of-art for arguments’ sake crashes into state-of-the-art of scientific achievement for liver transplants. If Dr Harbor had these two as students and knows their entire history, he has a moral judgment ahead of the possibility that Lydon’s liver will be compatible with Crosby’s metabolism or not.

a Conclusion
When is the best time to let Lydon know his liver is on call? What value is the comparisons made in the uncomfortable meeting; and will the objections stymie science lag and extinction periods?