SNOBBERY in the Valley
by Pat Darnell and Foxy Foe Faux's
Okay, anything I would say is an example of the most hideous nature. Criticizing of other person's domicile is really eat up. I wouldn't want to be shown how my Home on Parade might be lacking or sagging, or eating up non-renewing energy... right?
It turns out, much still could be said that might not make me a snotty nosed hypocrit. For instance, I very much like variety of faces on the street where I live. Apprsisals in a community however are lowered if there is no repeating architectural elements, observed lot line set-backs, or height limits observed.
Therefore, the little socialist components mixed with rugged individualist commentary is going to be the best sort of critique... no? Here following are MooPigs' Axioms of Criticism for Architectural Descriptions under these headings:
by Pat Darnell and Foxy Foe Faux's
Okay, anything I would say is an example of the most hideous nature. Criticizing of other person's domicile is really eat up. I wouldn't want to be shown how my Home on Parade might be lacking or sagging, or eating up non-renewing energy... right?
It turns out, much still could be said that might not make me a snotty nosed hypocrit. For instance, I very much like variety of faces on the street where I live. Apprsisals in a community however are lowered if there is no repeating architectural elements, observed lot line set-backs, or height limits observed.
Therefore, the little socialist components mixed with rugged individualist commentary is going to be the best sort of critique... no? Here following are MooPigs' Axioms of Criticism for Architectural Descriptions under these headings:
- Soldiers live in barracks
- Post Modern Storefront Architecture
- Pocket Architecture
- Rise of the Pre-fabricated Steel Building
- Rugged Individualisms
No comments:
Post a Comment